"If the sites are considered less safe, why not look elsewhere? Do not blame the government. They themselves are surveyed to find the location. They should be able to select an area safe from human disturbance and is able to provide enough food for the orangutans, "said Darori.
According to him, limited government funding and manpower to secure the wild animals intended for release. "The foundations that can fund a lot of help from the people of Europe or America to save the orangutan. Why they do not all pay for security personnel in the release area is it? Of course we will also help, "he said.
Should be responsible
The attitude of the Ministry of Forestry (Kemhut), according to forestry experts Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Hariadi Kartodihardjo, show errors of thinking. According to him, Kemhut should not only think about how to exploit the forest, but have also helped preserve the forest and its contents, including wildlife.
"They're still using a measure of performance success of the addition of revenue through the sale of timber and forest concessions in the short term," said Hariadi, who is also former Chairman of the Presidium of the National Forestry Council (DKN).
According to him, Kemhut should calculate the environmental services of forests, began to function as a carbon sink, preventing natural disasters such as floods and landslides, home to wild animals and micro organisms, to other commodities besides timber.
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Pay No Guarantees Safe Orangutan
Dengan url
http://savetheorangutanfromthescarcity.blogspot.com/2011/03/pay-no-guarantees-safe-orangutan.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Pay No Guarantees Safe Orangutan
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Pay No Guarantees Safe Orangutan
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Post a Comment